When I first discovered the true nature of the criminals out for our
enslavement, I was torn between the terms "Zionist" and "Jew" in naming
the criminals by name. I will freely admit that I too fell for the old
trick of looking upon the criminals as "Zionists" rather than
criminality of the entire tribe of Jews themselves. But we all learn
from our mistakes.....
I came across a most interesting article from my friend, Whitewraithe, who writes the blog: Pragmatic Witness, at www.pragmaticwitness.com, and I want to share it with everyone here. This article comes from the Veterans Today website, at www.veteranstoday.com, and is entitled: "Round-Robin: Submission On "The Jewish Question", and I want to share it with everyone who reads my own blog, right here. It contains a very interesting exchange of emails between Anthony Lawson, and John Kaminski, that focuses on the question of Zionism versus Judaism. I have my own thoughts and comments to follow:
NTS Notes: I do appreciate the work of both Anthony Lawson, and John Kaminski, in this fight for the truth. Therefore I will not slam either for their fine work that they have done in this fight against these criminals out for our enslavement.
However, the facts are coming clear that the entire tribe of Jews, and not just the "Zionists", are responsible for the mass genocides of the last few centuries, and the horrendous crimes against humanity that we see today.
What is indeed a fact is that if there are any "Good Jews" out there that are willing to stand up against the horrendous crimes of their criminal tribe, they are few and far between. We see the majority of this tribe, that are not directly involved in the horrific crimes, knowing full well about the crimes against us and refusing to do anything to stop them. The majority sit back and stay as silent cheerleaders of the actions of the worse part of their criminal tribe. That to me makes them accessories to the crime, and just as bad as the criminals themselves!
One minor correction in John's rebuttal... Albert Einstein did not invent Quantum Physics. The discovery of Quantum Physics and Quantum Mechanics rests mostly on the previous work of Max Planck, and subsequent work by Werner Heisenberg and others. It is a fact that Einstein, who I look upon as a plagiarist and a thief, actually abhorred many of the findings of Quantum Physics, especially when he has been credited with using the term: "God Does Not Roll Dice".
The bottom line is this: Until people come to the realization that this entire tribe bears responsibility for the ruination and mess that the world is in today, there is little chance of a unified front in defeating their criminality!
More to come
NTS
Article Source: Northerntruthseeker
I came across a most interesting article from my friend, Whitewraithe, who writes the blog: Pragmatic Witness, at www.pragmaticwitness.com, and I want to share it with everyone here. This article comes from the Veterans Today website, at www.veteranstoday.com, and is entitled: "Round-Robin: Submission On "The Jewish Question", and I want to share it with everyone who reads my own blog, right here. It contains a very interesting exchange of emails between Anthony Lawson, and John Kaminski, that focuses on the question of Zionism versus Judaism. I have my own thoughts and comments to follow:
Round – Robin: Submission on “The Jewish Question”
By using the term Zionist, you cover up the greater crimes of all Jews
—
By Frederick Toben, John Kaminski and Others
—
John
1. UNFORTUNATELY – what you have gushed forth in this below verbal flourish and stinging analysis is CORRECT, but not only!
2. HOWEVER
– some individuals have not attained the clarity of thought nor the
depth of perception that you have reached on this vexed topic, and so
ruthlessly to accuse them of deceiving, lying, covering-up the truth of a
matter, being Zionist stooges, is somewhat harsh.
3. REMEMBER
– the mind develops and some individuals’ minds are not ready to grasp
naked truths such as you have presented in the below item. As a teacher I
had to show patience towards those who showed promise of wishing to
embrace the truth of a matter, and such individuals had to be given time
to develop and mature. Our post- World-War-Two pedagogical philosophy
and political ideology is built mainly on lies, and it cries out that we
must ‘change’, when in fact individuals do not change but rather
develop and mature, if not outright degenerate. The concept of ‘change’
does not permit maturation to occur, especially not in a
materialistically-hedonistic society as is our
‘free-and-democratic-western-world’.
4. PATIENCE
to understand life’s complexities is an essential civilising attribute,
i.e. if one does not wish to develop mere scapegoating scenarios – and
hence I have my maxim to assist me in this respect: ‘Don’t only blame
the Jews, also blame those that bend to their pressure’. I say this
because in my 17-year-legal persecution it was Jews who persecuted me
and then demanded their pound of flesh, but it was non-Jews who assisted
them to collect their pound of flesh.
5. ALTHOUGH
your verbal outbursts are necessary alarm bells that civilised
individuals fear to hear, their sound is justified because it signifies
what the substance of our current value system is made of and what
threatens its very existence within our wider global-universal
BATTLE-of-the-WILLS.
6. YOUR task
has been to go out on a limb and has thus been an inevitably lonely and
frustrating one. Just remember that it has taken you decades to mature
and to grasp certain truths that instinctively you knew about perhaps
even when you were a child. You – and I include myself in this – are now
like the old oak tree that has weathered all sorts of storms and can
now relax, and with Goethe we can reminisce and reflect: In old age what
can a man do but to imbue the young with a little bit of wisdom he
himself has gathered on the way, and to pay elderly ladies compliments
so that they do not entirely despair!
7. NEVER
let yourself be ‘pissed off’ by anyone but continue to uphold the
eternal values/ideals of TRUTH, HONOUR, JUSTICE, LOVE, etc. I say this
in spite of the fact that I am totally aware of the fine line that
divides civilised discourse and essential physical and mental
self-defence.
8. FINALLY,
Kindest regards – and I am sending this through my list, and note I have only ONE list.
Fredrick
===============================================
From: John Kaminski [mailto:pseudoskylax@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2012 3:04 PM To:Anthony Lawson; Fredrick Töben; Arthur Topham Cc: Rod
Remelin; JB Campbell; Bob in DC; Clint WeRChange in Utah; Deanna
Spingola; Dr. Rebecca Carley; Fetch; John Friend; John H; Lonnie Totman;
Randy Atkins; Rebel of Oz Subject: By using the term Zionist, you cover up the greater crimes of all Jews
OK Anthony, now you’ve really pissed me
off, and at the same time revealed yourself, wittingly or unwittingly,
as an agent of the Jewish coverup of their world wide terror and mind
manipulation apparatus, right up there with Gordon Duff and David Icke
and Jeff Rense.
By being willingly obtuse, you make me explain to you the situation as I would to a first grader.
The Zionists didn’t kill 66 million non
Jews in Russia, it was Jews who called themselves Communists, backed by
Jews who called themselves Americans or Brits who had taken control of
the Western financial, legal and warmaking systems.
The Zionists didn’t engineer the
slaughter of half of France under the guise of a succession of puppets,
it was Jews who called themselves Jacobins, with help from
Jewish-controlled British intelligence, who called themselves
Englishmen.
The Zionists didn’t control the the
United States, Britain and the Soviet Union in stamping out the economic
independence of Adolf Hitler, it was Jews who deceived everyone into
thinking they were the forces of the free world, as Gen. George Patton
and Charles Lindbergh so rightly understood when they repeatedly talked
about Jewish control of the American media, government, and public
opinion.
Sigmund Freud may have been a Zionist
who twisted the minds of the whole world with his insane gobbledygook,
but he was first and foremost a Jew.
Albert Einstein may have been a Zionist who invented a false science of quantum physics, but he was first and foremost a Jew.
And it’s not Zionists who have
genocided the Palestinians, prostituted all the western governments by
bribery, blackmail and murder, are manipulating their war machine into a
series of non stop nation demolitions around the world after pulling
off the great false flag caper of all time — 9/11; it was Jews who
called themselves dual Israeli-American citizens and have looted America
and the world totally, all because they are following the orders of the
Talmud, which commands ALL Jews to kill or enslave all the non Jews of
the world, take an oath annually to lie about everything they say, and
enjoy holidays that all have the same theme — the vicious slaughter of
non Jews throughout history, which you may observe so vividly reflected
in the condition of the world today, thanks to the Jews, not all
Zionists, who control Wall Street and the U.S. Treasury and are bleeding
all the non Jews of the world TO DEATH.
And you never fail to point out that
it’s only the Zionists that are the problem — oh no, not the good Jews,
they’re on our side you say, working for justice. You — and Rense, with
all his secret Jews blurting out propaganda, Kirwan, Judy Andreas, Henry
Makow, Gordon Duff, Brother Nathanael, Tarpley, Livergood and all the
other secret Jews and Jewish sponsors and lawyers spinning the fiction
that they are on the side of actual human beings, but banning all the
nonspinners who actually talk openly about the Talmud lovers who control
the American government and media apparatus getting people to think
it’s only the Zionists who are the real source of evil — you are part of
that deceptive group, defending those “good Jews” who are helping to
free us from the bad Jews.
I suggest without further delay that you watch John Alan Martinson’s “The Myth of the Good Jew” <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=su5dM6yqc1s>
and then go out and find me a good Jew who can talk openly and candidly
about the Holocaust hoax, the Kol Nidre oath, the Jewish kidney and
white slavery businesses, the sexual perversion of American schools,
election and entertainment, the lovely rabbis who call people animals
and encourage the slaughter of children, and people like Richard Falk
and Gilad Atzmon who pretend the Jews had nothing to do with 9/11 or the
fixed American elections. And when you find them, be sure and call them
Zionists so you will leave them an avenue of escape from their crimes.
Be advised, Anthony, as I have said,
that the Talmud is the heart of darkness in human history, it’s not just
Zionists, which is a word you love to use because it’s such a great
coverup. No matter how kindly they speak or how sympathetic they pretend
to be about the misery in the world, it’s all Jews who are involved in
the conspiracy against humankind, against all life itself, and you and
Kirwan and Rense and Duff and Andreas are all singing kumbiyah and were
all in this together. Like you, these phonies have mastered the language
of misdirected outrage so thoroughly, and who love to use the coverup
word Zionist so all Jews won’t be blamed for the most heinous crimes
against innocent people in human history.
By your insistence on using the word
Zionist, you are part of that coverup. So go cry on the shoulders of
Arthur Topham or Norman Finkelstein or Jim Kirwan or any other of a
thousand poseurs who expose “the Zionist menace” which at the same time
cover up the complicity of all Jews in these crimes against non Jewish
humanity.
Is that clear enough for you, Anthony?
Any questions? Remember what else I’ve said (if you are familiar with my
work). It is a crime against humanity to defends, Jews, Jewishness or
Judaism, and you by your cowardly labeling are clearly guilty of that.
Best wishes,
John Kaminski
======================================
From: John Kaminski [mailto:pseudoskylax@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2012 1:55 PM To:Anthony Lawson Cc: Fredrick Töben Subject: Re: Do you want to explain this?
Anthony,
Please describe to me the “dirt” I have slung.
I was merely describing Arthur Topham’s endorsement of Gilad Atzmon and
CFR member Richard Falk, neither of whom recognizes Jewish participation
in 9/11, and comparing it to your fondness for Atzmon, for which at
least I thought I had excoriated you on at least two occasions, one of
them years ago which you probably don’t remember, and more recently in
the email to you and Fredrick. You continue to use the label Zionist
without realizing that the heart of the problem is the Talmud, which
encompasses all Jews, and that Zionist is a recent appellation, invented
to disguise crimes that are essentially and overwhelmingly Jewish.
Thus, I regard your efforts to differentiate between types of Jews, a
distinction I reject, as helpful to the Jewish coverup of their crimes.
Therefore, you are helping the Jews cover up their crimes.
Is that clear enough for you? Can you understand English?
Best wishes,
John Kaminski
————————–
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Anthony Lawson <lawson911@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Mr Kaminski,
When you’re slinging dirt, as I class what you’ve just written about me to be, why would you want me to remember, why can you not be more specific? You certainly had no qualm in not backing up your statement to the person it was originally written, which was certainly not me, and you did not send me a copy.
Don’t you support the notion that with free speech goes the responsibility that the accused should be informed of what he or she is being accused off, to others?
I do recall disagreeing with you on several issues, but what you’ve just written was totally unwarranted. Please, can you be more specific and copy what I wrote about you which prompted you to to write this:
When you’re slinging dirt, as I class what you’ve just written about me to be, why would you want me to remember, why can you not be more specific? You certainly had no qualm in not backing up your statement to the person it was originally written, which was certainly not me, and you did not send me a copy.
Don’t you support the notion that with free speech goes the responsibility that the accused should be informed of what he or she is being accused off, to others?
I do recall disagreeing with you on several issues, but what you’ve just written was totally unwarranted. Please, can you be more specific and copy what I wrote about you which prompted you to to write this:
Neither has ever mentioned Jewish participation — never mind planning, execution and total control — of[in] the 9/11 caper. I have just excoriated Anthony Lawson for much the same behavior,
Join up the highlighted sections and what you have written is a blatant
lie. The following video proves it, but you would rather smear someone
without including proof that the smear has any justification.
Friends of Israel — Enemies Inside the Gates http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UntixeRiEK8 Uploaded November 2010 Without
smoking gun documentation I will not make accusations, in my videos,
which I am unable to support with unchallengeable evidence, which does
not mean that I do not try to lead the viewers of my documentaries in
the direction of my thinking about what really happened and who I think was almost certainly responsible.
Christopher Bollyn seems to be sufficiently convinced of the value of my
anti-Israel videos, including the one above, which includes the Dancing Israelis and
the difficult-to-refute innuendo that they or some of their colleagues
must have known where the South Tower plane was going to appear,
following its steep descent of around 20,000 feet to begin its end run
of around 8,000 ft at a 3.5 degree slope towards the Tower, which
indicates foreknowledge, but such an accusation would hardly stand up in
court.
Christopher went to the expense and trouble of sending me a copy of his excellent book Solving 9-11 and a companion volume of some of his articles. Not cheap, because I live in Thailand.
So give me proof of the veracity of this un-presented excoriation, or flush out your poison pen for a moment or two and apologize for your grossly inaccurate statement linking me to two, as you put it
So give me proof of the veracity of this un-presented excoriation, or flush out your poison pen for a moment or two and apologize for your grossly inaccurate statement linking me to two, as you put it
card-carrying members of the false opposition.
How dare you!
Anthony Lawson
(Editor’s
note: Lawson never learned of the arrests at the George Washington
Bridge, ones far more important than the “Dancing Israelis,” though they
were telecast around the world and endlessly more important.)
——————————
On 26 December 2012 09:40, John Kaminski <pseudoskylax@gmail.com> wrote:
I was referring to our last email, which you might remember. The language stands as is.
———————————–
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Anthony Lawson <lawson911@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Mr Kaminski,
Apparently you wrote this:
Apparently you wrote this:
“Richard Falk is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the
handler of David Ray Griffin, both card-carrying members of the false
opposition. Neither has ever mentioned Jewish participation — never mind
planning, execution and total control — of the 9/11 caper. I have just
excoriated Anthony Lawson for much the same behavior, and it is clear
that you are nested with this Jewish false opposition in their drive to
convince the world that there are Jews who genuinely oppose the Israeli
monster while insisting they had nothing to do with 9/11.”
Can you explain what you are driving at and where you have “excoriated” me.
Anthony Lawson
Can you explain what you are driving at and where you have “excoriated” me.
Anthony Lawson
————————- Only fools believe what they are told, when it is clear that much else is being hidden.
===========================================================================
here follows an added item of interest from Michael Mazur
On 26/12/2012, at 20:37, “Fredrick Toben” <toben@toben.biz> wrote:
On 26/12/2012, at 20:37, “Fredrick Toben” <toben@toben.biz> wrote:
This is what it is all about – no regret!
———————————————————————-
From: Michael Mazur [mailto:mazur@iinet.net.au] Sent: Thursday, 27 December 2012 3:33 PM To: Fredrick Toben Subject: Re: This is what it is all about – no regret!
There
was no need for there to be a Battle for Monte Casino, as it could have
been bypassed and left ’til later, as they would have surrendered
having run out of food stocks by May 45.
Mussolini had already long been dead, and so safe conduct out of Italy would have been impossible.
There
were three objectives achieved by storming Monte Casino; killed a lot
of Germans, a lot of Allied troops, and destroyed a powerful Christian
icon.
Since we know the outcome we know who influenced the decision of whether to storm or not.
That’s, of course, the link to the Nuremberg Trials.
NTS Notes: I do appreciate the work of both Anthony Lawson, and John Kaminski, in this fight for the truth. Therefore I will not slam either for their fine work that they have done in this fight against these criminals out for our enslavement.
However, the facts are coming clear that the entire tribe of Jews, and not just the "Zionists", are responsible for the mass genocides of the last few centuries, and the horrendous crimes against humanity that we see today.
What is indeed a fact is that if there are any "Good Jews" out there that are willing to stand up against the horrendous crimes of their criminal tribe, they are few and far between. We see the majority of this tribe, that are not directly involved in the horrific crimes, knowing full well about the crimes against us and refusing to do anything to stop them. The majority sit back and stay as silent cheerleaders of the actions of the worse part of their criminal tribe. That to me makes them accessories to the crime, and just as bad as the criminals themselves!
One minor correction in John's rebuttal... Albert Einstein did not invent Quantum Physics. The discovery of Quantum Physics and Quantum Mechanics rests mostly on the previous work of Max Planck, and subsequent work by Werner Heisenberg and others. It is a fact that Einstein, who I look upon as a plagiarist and a thief, actually abhorred many of the findings of Quantum Physics, especially when he has been credited with using the term: "God Does Not Roll Dice".
The bottom line is this: Until people come to the realization that this entire tribe bears responsibility for the ruination and mess that the world is in today, there is little chance of a unified front in defeating their criminality!
More to come
NTS
Article Source: Northerntruthseeker